Los mejores errores en Afganistán
Friday, 8 de January de 2010 por Ramón
Consejos prácticos para escribir simplicidades sobre Afganistán, recibir grandes aplausos de las audiencias, reales y televisivas, y ayudar a quienes toman decisiones a equivocarse:
When writing about Afghanistan – whether an op-ed, a simple newspaper article, a long form magazine article or an analytical report- there are some simple things to keep in mind in order to keep standards as low as they currently are. The same applies for lectures, presentations, seminars and radio or TV reporting. Here goes:
- Offer simple explanations for everything, no matter how complex. Nobody wants to hear that there is no sound answer or that “it’s extremely complicated.”
- Make a gross generalizations about Afghans based on a single Afghan you met (a far too small sample size will also suffice).
- Ignore dissenting opinion on the ground if it contradicts your set of biases.
- Mistake your English-speaking Kabuli contacts as representative of all Afghans.
- Mistake the Kandahari guys you speak to through an interpreter as representative of all Afghans.
- Repeat some false historical cliché about Afghanistan. Only the historians will be able to call your BS in a convincing manner.
- Hold out the offer of a solution to all the problems with yourself and your ideas at the center (i.e., the Snake Oil approach).
- Use exoticisms that make you sound really informed. Something like “Pashtunwali,” “Deobandi,” “badal,” “arbakai,” “jirga,” “shura,” etc… You don’t understand these terms in their social context. But no worries, neither does your reader.
- Place yourself as a central character in your article. You are Lawrence of Arabia, or perhaps Tintin. You are the intrepid hero of your hopefully non-fictional adventure. Just go with it. People love a good story.
- Create a “Pet Afghan.” Basically you need to cheer for some Afghan power figure like he’s your favorite sports team.
Mas en 29 Tips for Bad Writing on Afghanistan en el blog Ghosts of Alexander
Si no fuese dramático sería de chiste. En fin.
Saludos
Con mi inglés macarrónico, lo que entiendo es que lo importante no es informar lo más objetivamente posible de los hechos sino seguir difundiendo prejuicios y tópicos, diciendo lo que se espera que se diga porque de antemano está todo establecido, ¿no?
Pues vaya mierda!!! Y el profesional o la profesional que haga eso tiene poco de profesional y menos de persona.
Un saludo, Montse
Hola Ramon,
muy interesante, como de costumbre. Me permito enviarte un link a un video que quizá hayas visto ya, pero que a mi me ha llegado recientemente a través del bloc de un amigo y que me parece interesante. Es el testimonio de un soldado norteamericano que ha estado en Irak, hablando sobre las atrocidades cometidas.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hPxTtvr5N58
Un abrazo desde Barcelona,
Jordi
El link del video que subió Jordi fue eliminado, me gustaría saber si se ùede encontrar en otro sitio.